Topics: Professional liability

Good news for directors and officers – successful appeal against Bridgecorp decision

An earlier judgment that suggested that directors may be unable to rely on Directors’ and Officers’ (D&O) liability insurance to fund defence costs has been reversed. The overturned decision had effectively prevented directors accessing a single policy, intended to cover both defence costs and claims for damages, where a civil claim (e.g. a class action by shareholders) was held to have first priority over the insurance money.

Read More »

Australian Court to decide whether directors can rely on Directors’ and Officers’ cover to fund defence costs

A decision of the New Zealand High Court last year cast doubt on whether directors could rely on D&O policies to fund their defence costs. It was held that civil claimants held the priority interest in Directors’ and Officers’ liability cover (D&O) under a statutory charge, and could prevent company directors from accessing the insurance funds to pay defence costs.

Read More »

A case of two hats: client legal professional

Client legal professional privilege lies at the heart of Australia’s legal system. Essentially, it is the principle that confidential communications between a client and a legal advisor should be protected to facilitate honest and open communication between them.

Read More »