08 December 2014

SMSFs: Are limited recourse borrowing arrangements on borrowed time? Murray Inquiry recommends abolition!

In the final report for the Financial Systems Inquiry handed down on Sunday 7 December 2014, chairman David Murray recommended that: Government should restore the general prohibition on direct borrowing by superannuation funds by removing Section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) on a prospective basis.

In the final report for the Financial Systems Inquiry handed down on Sunday 7 December 2014, chairman David Murray recommended that:

Government should restore the general prohibition on direct borrowing by superannuation funds by removing Section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) on a prospective basis.

The Inquiry is concerned that LRBAs pose a risk to both the superannuation and financial systems. By restating the blanket prohibition on borrowing to acquire assets, the inquiry is of the view that:

  • this will limit the unnecessary build-up of risk in the superannuation and financial system
  • ensure the superannuation system is used as a retirement savings vehicle rather than a broader wealth management vehicle.

In particular, the Inquiry was of the view that:

Restoring the original prohibition on direct borrowing by superannuation funds would preserve the strengths and benefits the superannuation system has delivered to individuals, the financial system and the economy, and limit the risks to taxpayers.

However, the Inquiry recommended grandfathering existing SMSF borrowings using LRBAs until the asset is disposed of.

Click this link to read the full recommendation in relation to SMSF borrowing.

Be Cautious

If you have clients that are looking to borrow to acquire an asset, care should be taken particularly if the purchase contract provides for an extended contract period such as house and land contracts and off the plan contracts.

If the Government adopts the Inquiry’s recommendation, SMSFs may be placed in a difficult position where a purchase contract has been signed if:

  • the legislation is changed before the acquisition of the asset using borrowings is complete; and
  • the grandfathering rules do not extend to arrangements where purchase contracts have already been signed.

Please contact a member of our team if you would like to discuss SMSF and limited recourse borrowing arrangements further.

Like this article? Share it via:

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please let us know.

Stay up to date with CGW

Subscribe to our interest lists to receive legal alerts, articles, event invitations and offers.

Key contacts

Scott-Hay-Bartlem
Scott Hay-Bartlem
Partner
Clinton-Jackson
Clinton Jackson
Partner

Areas of expertise

Read next