Team Members

Chloe Hogan

Associate
Chloe provides advice to companies and individuals in relation to litigation and dispute resolution matters.

Chloe provides advice to companies and individuals in relation to litigation and dispute resolution matters.

As an associate in Cooper Grace Ward’s litigation and dispute resolution team, Chloe acts for large commercial clients and for individuals in a range of contentious matters, including contractual claims, defamation and reputation disputes, intellectual property disputes, property disputes, competition and consumer related matters and other commercial disputes.

Before joining Cooper Grace Ward, Chloe worked in a national law firm, first in commercial property and construction, before transitioning into commercial litigation. As a result of her experience, Chloe takes a pragmatic and commercial approach to achieving clients’ objectives through litigation and dispute resolution procedures.

  • Solicitor – Supreme Court of Queensland and High Court of Australia
  • Bachelor of Laws (First Class Honours) – Queensland University of Technology
  • Master of Laws (Entertainment, Technology, Media and Sports, Business Law) – University of California, Los Angeles
  • Bachelor of Business (Finance) (Dean’s Honours) – Queensland University of Technology
  • Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice – College of Law

Litigation

  • Advising individuals in defamation and reputation disputes and proceedings, including issues relating to social media.
  • Advising businesses in relation to alleged breaches of the federal competition and consumer legislation, including misleading and deceptive conduct and the unfair terms provisions
  • Advising various businesses and individuals in relation to breach of contract claims in Queensland, New South Wales and South Australia.
  • Assisting energy sector clients on progressing claims and appeals in Queensland, Western Australia and the High Court.
  • Advising energy sector clients on environmental prosecution matters.
  • Experience in advising and assisting both plaintiffs and defendants in proceedings in the Supreme, District and Magistrates Court in Queensland, interstate courts, and the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Property and construction

  • Acting for landlords and tenants in disputes arising from commercial and retail shop leases.
  • Advising property owners on body corporate related issues and disputes.
  • Assisting landlords and tenants with dispute proceedings before QCAT and the District and Supreme Courts.
  • Assisting on a variety of construction and property-related matters for key Queensland Government projects, including the Cross River Rail Project and the Toowoomba Second Range Crossing.
  • Acting for corporate landlords in relation to tenant disputes.
  • Advising national construction corporations on financing arrangements.

Intellectual property

  • Assisting clients on a broad range of intellectual property disputes, including trademark infringement claims, ownership of IP claims and copyright and patent disputes.

Alternative dispute resolution

  • Appearing at mediations and settlement conferences.
  • Assisting clients achieve early resolution of disputes by way of pre-litigation negotiations and settlements.

Areas of Expertise

Publications

IP perspectives: deregistration risk arising from ‘non-use’ of a registered trade mark

‘Non-use’ of a registered trade mark can result in the trade mark being deregistered. The recent Federal Court decision of Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc considered this issue and the use required to maintain trade mark registration.

Defamation perspectives: the ‘serious harm’ element a serious hurdle for plaintiffs

The recent Queensland Supreme Court decision in Peros v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 3) demonstrates that even the gravest of accusations may not meet the threshold of serious harm under defamation law.

Trade mark infringement: is reputation relevant to assessing deceptive similarity?

The protection of business reputation is crucial to any successful business, and often the commercial motivation behind registering a trade mark. But is reputation relevant to determining deceptive similarity in trade mark infringement cases? The High Court of Australia has clarified the position in a recent case.