GST-free supply of a going concern – have the parties agreed in writing?

07 December 2009 Topics: Tax and revenue

A recent decision of the Full Federal Court provides a reminder to draft contracts carefully to avoid any unintended consequences.

In South Steyne Hotel P/L v Commissioner of Taxation, the sale of a strata-titled apartment was found to be a GST-free supply of a going concern, despite an inconsistent clause within the sale contract.


South Steyne:

  • purchased the Sebel Manly Beach Hotel and converted it to a strata-titled serviced apartment complex;
  • contracted an operator to manage the complex; and
  • separately leased each of the apartments to a further management company.

Each lease obliged the management company to operate a scheme whereby all apartments were operated as part of the serviced apartment business.

Subsequently, South Steyne sold a number of the apartments to investors, subject to the continuing leases to the management company.

Decision – GST-free sale of a going concern

Page 1 and clause 47.6.3 of each contract stated that the sale of the apartments would be a GST-free supply of a going concern.  However, these provisions were inconsistent with a further clause within the contract, providing for application of the margin scheme.

There was agreement between the ATO and South Steyne that the company had:

  • supplied all things necessary for the continued operation of the serviced apartment business; and
  • carried on the business until completion.

However, the Commissioner argued that, as a result of the inconsistent drafting, the parties had not agreed that the sale was a supply of a going concern – negating the application of the exemption and making the sale a taxable supply.

Although the Commissioner was successful at first instance, the Full Federal Court decided that it was unlikely that the parties had intended to over-ride their purported agreement (in clauses 1 and 47.6.3) that the sale would be subject to the going-concern exemption from GST.

In a Decision Impact Statement issued by the ATO, the Commissioner has indicated that he will not seek leave to appeal the decision of the Court on this issue.



Contact Us

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please let us know.